The construction of a theological system, the sanctuary, and Adventist theology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19141/1809-2454.kerygma.v21.n1.pe2115Keywords:
sanctuary, theological system, unifying center, theological methodAbstract
The use of a biblical motif as an integrative center or principle of articulation in a theological system is commonly practiced and methodologically discussed in theological literature. In the context of Adventist theology, the sanctuary is considered one of the main integrative motifs for the development of a theological system. The purpose of the present article is to depict proposals regarding the foundational place of the biblical sanctuary for the articulation of theological topics in Scripture from a systematic and biblical perspective. In interaction with these proposals, the complex debates concerning the definition of a theological (integrative) center in Scripture are taken into account. From a methodological standpoint, an interdisciplinary approach is adopted that involves the areas of Adventist studies, biblical theology, and systematic theology. In the area of Adventist studies, it is described how the sanctuary played a role in the development of a theological system in the history of Adventist theology. Then, in the areas of biblical theology and systematic theology, different proposals concerning the integrative use of the sanctuary by biblical and systematic theologians are described and examined in light of the problematization of the use of a theological unifying center.
Downloads
References
ANDREWS, J. N. The Sanctuary. Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, v. 30, n. 1, p. 12, 18 jun. 1867.
BALTHASAR, H. Theo-drama: theological dramatic theory. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1989-1998.
BARR, James. The concept of biblical theology: an Old Testament perspective. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1999.
BOFF, C. Teoria do método teológico. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2015.
CANALE, F. Philosophical foundations and the Biblical Sanctuary. Andrews University Seminary Studies, v. 36, n. 2, p. 183-206, 1998.
CANALE, F. From vision to system: finishing the task of Adventist Theology, part III – sanctuary and hermeneutics. Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, v. 17, n. 2, 2006.
CANALE, F. On being the remnant. Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, v. 24, n. 1, p. 127-174, 2013.
CARSON, D. A. New Testament theology. In: MARTIN, R. P.; DAVIS, P. H. (ed.). Dictionary of the Later New Testament & its developments. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1997.
COTTRELL, R. F. Sanctuary. Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, v. 23, n. 3, p. 21, 15 dez. 1863.
DAVIDSON, R. M. Cosmic metanarrative for the coming millennium. Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, v. 11, n. 1-2, p. 102-119, 2000.
DAVIDSON, R. M. Back to the beginning: Genesis 1–3 and the theological center of Scripture. In: MOSKALA, J. (ed.). Christ, salvation, and the eschaton: essays in honor of Hans K. LaRondelle. Berrien Springs, MI: OT Department, SDA Theological Seminary, Andrews University, 2009.
DAVIDSON, R. M. Earth’s first sanctuary: Genesis 1–3 and parallel creation accounts. Andrews University Seminary Studies, v. 53, n. 1, p. 65-89, 2015.
DAVIDSON, R. M. A song for the sanctuary: experiencing God’s presence in shadow and reality. Silver Spring, MD: Biblical Research Institute; Review and Herald Academic, 2022.
FIDDES, P. S. Concept, image and story in systematic theology. International Journal of Systematic, v. 11, n. 1, p. 3-23, 2009.
FORD, D. F. System, story, performance: a proposal about the role of narrative in Christian systematic theology. In: HAUERWAS, S.; JONES, L. G. (ed.). Why narrative: readings in narrative theology. Eugene: Wipf and Stock, 1997. p. 191-215.
GRAF, R. The principle of articulation in Adventist Theology: an evaluation of current interpretations and proposal. 2017. Dissertation (Doctor of Theology) – Adventist International Institute of Advanced Studies, Silang, 2017.
GULLEY, N. R. Systematic theology: prolegomena. Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press, 2003.
HAMILTON, J. The glory of God in salvation through judgment: the center of Biblical theology? Tyndale Bulletin, v. 57, n. 1, 2006.
HASEL, F. M. Recent trends in methods of Biblical interpretation. In: HASEL, F. M. (ed.). Biblical hermeneutics: an Adventist approach. Silver Spring, MD: Biblical Research Institute and Review and Herald Academic, 2020.
HASEL, G. F. New Testament theology: basic issues in the current debate. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1978.
HASEL, G. F. Old Testament theology: basic issues in the current debate. 4 ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991.
HAUERWAS, S. After Christendom? How the church is to behave if freedom, justice, and a Christian nation are bad ideas. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1991.
HAUERWAS, S. The work of theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.
HEIDE, G. System and story: narrative critique and construction in theology. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2009. (Princeton theological monograph series, v. 87).
HEIDE, G. Timeless truth in the hands of history: a short history of system in theology. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2012. (Princeton theological monograph series, v. 178).
HOUSE, P. R. Biblical theology and the wholeness of Scripture. In: HAFEMANN, S. J. (ed). Biblical theology: retrospect and prospect. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002.
HUEBNER, H. Within the limits of story alone? CGRev, v. 13, n. 2, p. 157-161, 1995.
OURO, R. Old Testament theology: the canonical key. Zaragoza: Lusar Repograficas, 2008.
OURO, R. The sanctuary: the canonical key of the Old Testament theology. Andrews University Seminary Studies, v. 50, n. 2, p. 159-177, 2012.
OURO, R. El santuario: el paradigma de la teologia bíblica. Chile: Editorial Debir, 2025.
PECKHAM, J. C. Toward a systematic theology of the sanctuary. In: A song for the sanctuary: experiencing God’s presence in shadow and reality. Silver Spring, MD: Biblical Research Institute; Review and Herald Academic, 2022. p. 679-712.
PÖHLER, R. J. Does Adventist Theology have, or need, a unifying center? In: MOSKALA, J. (ed.). Christ, salvation, and the eschaton: essays in honor of Hans K. LaRondelle. Berrien Springs, MI: OT Department, SDA Theological Seminary, Andrews University, 2009. p. 17-32.
RICOEUR, P. Time and narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. v. 1.
RODRIGUES, A. M. Thinking Systematically with the scriptural christology of hebrews: contributions to the theology of Christ’s threefold office. Andrews University Seminary Studies, v. 58, n. 1, p. 33-63, 2020.
RODRIGUES, A. M. Theology and the hermeneutics of testimony: progress in theological interpretation? In: BRINK, G.; PEELS, R.; SOLLEREDER, B. (ed.). Progress in theology: does the quenn of the sciences advance? London: Routledge, 2025. p. 106-108.
SCOBIE, Charles H. H. New Directions in Biblical Theology. Themelíos, v. 17, n. 2, p. 4-8, 1992.
SMITH, U. The sanctuary and the twenty three hundred days of Daniel VIII,14. Battle Creek, MI: Review and Herald, 1877.
TIMM, A. R. The sanctuary and the Three Angels’ messages 1844-1863: integrating factors in the development of Seventh-day Adventist doctrines. 1995. Dissertation (PhD in Religion) – Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, 1995.
TIMM, A. R. The sanctuary motif within the framework of the Great Controversy. In: DU PREEZ, R.; MOSKALA, J. (ed.). The cosmic battle for the planet earth: essays in honor of Norman R. Gulley. Berrien Springs, MI: OT Department, SDA Theological Seminary, Andrews University, 2003. p. 59-84.
VANHOOZER, K. J. The drama of doctrine: a canonical-linguistic approach to Christian Theology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2005.
WATSON, T. The Meaning and Function of System in Theology. 2012. 295 f. Dissertation (PhD in Religion) – Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI, 2012.
WEBSTER, J. Introduction: systematic theology. In: WEBSTER, J.; TANNER, K.; TORRANCE, I. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of systematic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
WHITE, E. G. The spirit of prophecy. Battle Creek, MI: Review and Herald, 1884. v. 4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kerygma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Statement
In summary, authors who publish in Kerygma must agree that:
-
Once accepted for publication, the copyright of the articles is transferred to Kerygma.
-
All third-party materials used in the text must be properly referenced.
-
Authors must hold the rights or permissions for the use of images, tables, and other graphic materials.
-
Authors guarantee that the submitted manuscript is original, of their own authorship, and has not been submitted or published elsewhere.
-
The opinions and ideas expressed in the texts are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.
-
The editors reserve the right to make textual revisions and adjustments in accordance with the journal’s editorial standards.
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-
Authors authorize the reproduction and adaptation of the material by Kerygma, with the authors’ participation or express authorization when required.
-
The journal may distribute, store, archive, and make the articles available through any physical or digital means, whether free of charge or paid.
-
Authors may enter into separate agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work, provided that the original publication in Kerygma is acknowledged.
-
Full or partial reproduction of the texts in other publications requires prior written authorization from the editor.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or personal webpages) before or during the editorial process, as this may increase the visibility and citation impact of the published work.
