The Covenant in Micah 3:1-4:8: An Intertextual Analysis of the Meaning of the Message of Judgment and Restoration of Israel

Authors

  • Davi R. França

Keywords:

Intertextuality, Intertext, Covenant, Literary Form, Oracle, Micah 3, 1-4, 8.

Abstract

 The present study investigates the theory of intertextuality as a handy tool for biblical hermeneutics. After a brief introduction to the theory and a proposal for the classification of the inter-texts, it is undertaken a verification of the phenomena of intertextuality in Micah 3:1-4:8. The text is considered in its final canonical form. Besides pointing out the inter-texts present in the literary unity, and provide their classification and analysis, the study evidenced also the significant presence of the theme of the covenant in the prophetic discourse of Micah. The inter-textual analysis substantiated in addition the traditional view concerning the authorship of the text of the pericope, since, besides the covenant's concepts and terms that permeated it, the text seems to have being structured according to a key text on the covenant in the Bible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AICHELE, George e PHILLIPS, Gary A. Introduction: Exegesis, Eisegesis, Intergesis, in Semeia, 1995, 69-70

ALFARO, J. Micah: Justice and Loyalty - International Theological Commentary. Grand Rabids: Willian B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1989.

ALLEN, Leslie C. The Books of Joel, Obadiah, Jonah and Micah - New International Commentary on The Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Willian B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1976.

ALONSO-SCHÖKEL, L. e DIAZ, J. L. S. Profetas II. São Paulo: Edições Paulinas, 1991.

ANDERSEN, Francis I. e FREEDMAN, David N. Hosea - The Anchor Bible. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1980.

BARTON, J. Intertextuality and The "Final Form" Of the Text, in Congress Volume Oslo199. Boston: E. J. Brill, 2000.

BERGEY, Ronald. The Song of Moses (Deuteronomy 32.1-43) and Isaianic Prophecies: A Case of Early Intertextuality? in JSOT, 2003, 28, no. 1.

BIDDLE, Mark E. Ancestral Motifs in 1 Samuel 25: Intertextuality and Characterization, in JBL, 2002, 121, no. 4.

BOTTERWECK, G. J. e RINGGREN, H. [eds.]. Theological Dictionary or the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Willian B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1997, v. II.

BRIGHT, John. História de Israel. São Paulo: Paulus, 1980.

CHISHOLM, Robert B. Interpreting de Minor Prophets. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1990.

CORREA, S. T. Intertextualidad y exegesis intra-bíblica: dos caras de la misma moneda? Breve análise de las presuposiciones metodologicas, en DavarLogos: Revista Biblico-Teológica de La Facultad de Teologia Universidad Adventista del Plata. Entre Rios, Argentina: Imprensa Universidad Adventista del Plata, 2006, v. 5, no. 1.

ESLINGER, L. Inner-Biblical Exegesis and Inner-Biblical Allusion: The Question of Category, in Vetus Testamentum, 1992, 42, no. 1.

FEE, Gordon D. e STUART, Douglas. Entendes o que lês? Um guia para entender a Bíblia com o auxílio da exegese e da hermenêutica. São Paulo: Vida Nova, 1997.

FEWELL, Danna Nolan, "Introduction: Writing, Reading, and Relating." in Reading Between Texts: Intertextuality and the Hebrew Bible. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1992.

FISHBANE, Michael. Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

FREEDMAN, David N. The Unity or the Hebrew Bible. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1993.

HASEL, Gerhard F. Teologia do Antigo e do Novo Testamento - questões básicas no debate atual. São Paulo: Academia Cristã, 2007.

HARRISON, R. K. Introduction to The Old Testament. Grand Rapids:Willian B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1969.

HEPNER, Gershon. Verbal Resonance in the Bible and Intertextuality, in JSOT, 2001, 96, no. 1.

HILLERS, Delbert R. Micah: Hermeneia - A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Augsburg, MN: Fortress, 1991.

HOUSE, Paul. Old Testament Survey. Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1992.

HUFFMON, Herbert B. The Convenant Lawsuit in Prophets, in JBL, 1959, 78.

KAISER, Walter C. Inner Biblical Exegesis as a Model for Bridging The "Then" And "Now" Gap: Hos 12:1-6, in JETS, 1985, 28, no. 1.

__________, Walter C. Toward na Old Testament Theology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1978.

KOCH, Ingedore V. O texto e a construção dos sentidos. São Paulo: Contexto, 2005.

KOCH, Ingedore V., BENTES, Anora C. e CAVALCANTE, Mônica N. Intertextualidade: diálogos possíveis. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007.

KOCH, Ingedore V. e ELIAS, Vanda M. S. Ler e compreender: os sentidos do texto. São Paulo: Contexto, 2006.

LA SOR, William S., HUBBARD, David A., BUSH, Frederic W. Old Testament Survey. Grand Rapids, MI: Willian B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1992.

LIMBURG, James. Hosea - Micah:Interpretation. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1988.

__________, James. The Root byrI and the Prophetic Lawsuit Speeches, in JBL, 1969, 88.

MCCOMISKEY, Thomas E. The Expositor´s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1985.

NIELSEN, Kristen. Intertextuality and Biblical Scholarship, in JSOT, 1990, 2.

__________, Kirsten. Yahweh as Prosecutor and Judge, in JSOT Supplement Series 9. Sheffield: JSOT, 1978.

NOBLE, Paul R. Esau, Tamar, and Joseph: Criteria for Identifying Inner-Biblical Allusion, in Vetus Testamentum, 2002, vol. 52, no. 2.

O´DAY, Gail R. Jeremiah 9:22-23 and I Corinthians 1:26-31 – A Study in Intertextuality, in JBL, 1990, 109, no. 2.

PFEIFFER, C. F. The Biblical World. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1966.

RAD, Gerhard Von. Teologia do Antigo Testamento. São Paulo: Aste, 1973.

SCHULTZ, Samuel J. A história de Israel no Antigo Testamento. São Paulo: Edições Vida Nova, 2002.

SCOTT, R. B. Y. The Relevance of the Prophets - An Introduction to the Old Testament Prophets and Their Message. New York: Macmilliam Company, 1968.

SIQUEIRA, Reinaldo W. A forma literária do “oráculo contra Israel” em Amós 2:6-16, em Acta Científica - Ciências Humanas. Engenheiro Coelho, SP: Unaspress, 2002, vol. 1, no. 2.

SMITH, Ralph L. Micah to Malachi - Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, TE: Word Books Publisher, 1984.

SOMMER, Benjamin D. Exegesis, Allusion and Intertextuality in the Hebrew Bible: A Response to Lyle Eslinger, in Vetus Testamentum, 1996, 46, no. 4.

VANGEMEREM, Willem. Interpreting the Prophetic Word. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1990.

WALTKE, Bruce K. Obadiah, Jonah, Micah - Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries. Illinois: Downers Grove, 1988.

WALTKE, Bruce K., ARCHER, Gleason L. e HARRIS, R. L. Dicionário Internacional de Teologia do Antigo Testamento. São Paulo: Vida Nova, 1998.

WATTS, John D., Review & Expositor, 1984, vol. 84, no. 1.

WESTERMANN, C. Basic Forms of Prophetic Speech. Louisville, KY: Westminster Press, 1991.

__________ C. Prophetic Oracles of Salvation in the Old Testament. Louisville, KY: Westminster Press, 1991.

WOLFF, Hans W. Micah - A commentary. Augsburg, MN: Fortress, 1990

Downloads

Published

2010-03-04

How to Cite

FRANÇA, D. R. The Covenant in Micah 3:1-4:8: An Intertextual Analysis of the Meaning of the Message of Judgment and Restoration of Israel. Kerygma, Engenheiro coelho (SP), v. 6, n. 1, p. 136, 2010. Disponível em: https://unasp.emnuvens.com.br/kerygma/article/view/180. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2010)

Section

Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso

License

Authors who publish on Kerygma must agree to the following terms:

  1. Once accepted for publication, the copyright of articles is automatically transferred to Kerygma.
  2. All material used in the text that is copyrighted by third parties must be duly referenced.
  3. Authors must also retain the reproduction rights of images and tables in their material, if necessary.
  4. The authors guarantee that the submitted text is entirely their authorship and has not been submitted and/or published elsewhere.
  5. The opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts are the sole responsibility of their authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Kerygma;
  6. The editors reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt to the publication's norms.
  7. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, which allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they give proper credit to you and their new works are not used for commercial purposes. However, users are not required to license those derivative works under the same terms.
  8. The authors agree with the free reproduction of their material by Kerygma, which may adapt, modify, condense, summarize, reduce, compile, expand, alter, mix with other content, include images, graphics, digital objects, infographics and hyperlinks, illustrate, diagram, divide, update, translate and carry out any other transformations, requiring the participation or express authorization of the authors.
  9. The authors agree that Kerygma can distribute the articles through cable, fiber optics, satellite, airwaves or any other system that allows access to the user at a specific time and place, either by free channels or by systems that import payment. Kerygma may also include work in a physical or virtual database, archiving in printed format, storing on a computer, in a cloud system, microfilming and other current forms of archiving or that may still be developed, with or without profit.
  10. Authors are permitted to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (e.g., publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment in the new publication of its initial publication in this journal.
  11. Kerygma owns the rights to all works published by it. The full reproduction of these texts in other publications, for any other purpose, by any means, requires written authorization from the publisher. The same goes for partial reproductions, such as summary, abstract, portions with more than 500 words of the text, tables, figures, illustrations, etc.
  12. Authors are granted permission and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process. This is because it can lead to productive alterations and increase the impact and citation of the published work. (See "The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies.")